Technological and community

“We are now living in a globalised world” seems to be a favorite catchphrase among authors and writers, and applicable to businesses and organisations because transactions can be conducted at an instance, and people can communicate from one side of the globe to the other end with just a personal computer and an internet connection. Moreover, because of globalisation national borders are not very important now, and there is the interconnectedness of organisations and businesses, while countries focus more on deregulation, privatisation and liberalisation of industries, and the importance of world markets.
Global firms use many different structural forms in dealing with globalisation. They can use the horizontal structure because this is made easier with the availability of the internet and Information Technology. Globalisation affects very much the ordinary community. Significant social changes can take place both before and after the phases of the most intense physical activities, for example, construction, production, and expansion. pathways of influence can be social as well as physical.
Nevertheless, the technological changes have brought about inequalities because of the digital divide in the community setting where there is lack of technological attention from the government and the business or private sector on the part of these communities which are seen to not being able to contribute to progress and development.
No human enterprise can surpass technology’s success in improving the material conditions, enhancing the cognitive attributes, and attenuating the physical limitations of humans. While some celebrate the coming of unprecedented wealth and prosperity brought on by the recent advances in genetic engineering, nanotechnology, computer-communication systems, and so on, others bemoan the possible demise of humans as autonomous social beings because of the coming of the so-called cyborgs, transgenic organisms, and clones. (Parayil, 1999, p.