Becoming a Subject of Truth

Becoming a of Truth There have been wide explanations to the of truth and its meaning. Many philosophers have devised theories with an aim of explaining this topic. Ideally, philosophers have disagreed on very fundamental aspects of human life and their beliefs. However, there is no universal definition of truth and its meaning. In evaluating, Kierkegaards response that we may only live in truth by "becoming a subject", we will need to define the dominant theme, pragmatism. It refers to a belief that human ideas carry some meaning or truth if and only if they produce practical results that are effective to our aims. Indeed, the issue of truth has been a subject of discussion in the field of philosophy for many years with the knowledge that though something might seem to be true, its meaning may not be necessary true.
Whereas rationalists believe that truth is universal, some philosophers like James believe that truth happens to an idea while Kierkegaards observes that we can only live in truth by "becoming a subject.” The practicability of truth is very significant in trying to understand the topic because results are facts that can easily define truth. Indeed, some philosophers have in the recent past made us believe in some of their theories about the truth in relation to the universe, human mind, and existence of super beings only to encounter negations from certain practical results. As such, a human idea will only qualify to be a truth if the expected results from the assumption of truth are effective and relevant to the current goals.
Hence, when Kierkegaards responds that we may only live in truth by "becoming a subject," his idea correlates with the practicability of truth. Actually, human beings manifest the truth in the way they speak and act if they are part of that truth. Inclusion plays a great role in advocating for truth. Where an individual is part of a plot, they will be more obliged to search and advocate for truth since they will be part of the accrued results. The realities of events and processes associate with the practical results that come up in real time. These results stand in the line between the truth and a lie. In many cases, such results prove opposite of truth. However, where an individual are directly involved in the events and processes the actual truth and its meaning come in handy. Imagine a lawyer representing a criminal in a court of law where he convinces the criminal on how he will be acquainted based on the lawyer’s defense and the law. The judge will always prove the lawyer wrong by seeking the facts in law. Nevertheless, it is not always easy to become a subject in the search for truth and its meaning. Hence, cases of humans believing in things they perceive to be true yet their meaning and results do not reflect the truth are still dominant. Indeed, an idea may be true but its meaning and results tend to the contrary. Kierkegaards response of living in truth by "becoming a subject,” is the surest way of guaranteeing truth in its meaning and practical results. Otherwise, seeking the truth from exclusion will lead to negative meanings and results of truth.